Scott Stilson


#

šŸŽ§ šŸŽµ Ram (1971) by Paul and Linda McCartney.

An oddball, trifling McCartney album I enjoy front to back. (One of only two.) Proof that music need not be deep to be good. The most Beatlesy of all their solo albums, full of fun melodies, interesting chord progressions, charmingly goofy singing, and production that’s generous without ever falling into schmaltz. It’s fun to picture Paul enjoying cutting records with his wife! (And I’ll listen to Linda over Yoko any day.) The album is not the headwaters of indie pop, as has been claimed; that’s the Beach Boys’ two 1967 albums. But it is a very good early exemplar. The only criticism I’ll brook is that it may come across at times a tinch too self-consciously mannered.

As I age, I find I’m less of a Lennon guy and more of a McCartney guy. Is that progress? Is that common?

#

šŸŽØ I’m dithering writing to myself about Paul McCartney while wife is making this:

Custom stained glass craft (in progress) inspired by a Norwegian tapestry by Scott Stilson’s wife

#

ā€œOnly rich people can live like Wendell Berry,ā€ said my friend Josh last night, helping me articulate a misgiving I have about what The Farmer advocates. I don’t think it’s entirely true, but I do think it’s an examining thought worth bringing when you read Berry. šŸ“–

#

šŸŽ§ šŸŽµ I’m glad I kept my CD copy of Superchic[k]’s Karaoke Superstars. Cute, catchy, honest, lightly theistic punk-pop whose lead vocalist was clearly in her early twenties when she wrote it but was nevertheless equipped with the kind of wisdom that twenty-somethings need.

#

In conversation with a friend last night, we developed a fourfold list of precepts that, if held together (in partial tension, for sure), will lead to a happy life:

  1. Give thanks in all circumstances.
  2. Do what you’re doing. Don’t worry about the rest.
  3. Follow the impulses of your eyes and the desires of your heart, yet know that God will bring you to judgment for all these things.
  4. It’s a fact that you will not accomplish and experience all the things you want to before you die.
#

The ideal birthday communication is neither the tired greeting card not the awkward phone call. The first is unremarkable; the second requires too much of the recipient. Instead, it’s a heartfelt voice message sent via text. šŸŽ‰

#

Circumvent Google’s default search results page—including its new, unwelcome AI results—and return to a simple list of blue links. šŸ’»

#

Saying ā€œthank you for your patienceā€ before the speaker knows his listener will give it is presumptuous. Better to say ā€œI’m sorry.ā€

#

I stand with carbohydrates. šŸž

#

šŸŽ§ šŸŽµ I happened across a CD copy of local bluegrass stalwarts Tussey Mountain Moonshiners’ 2016 album SHINE last year at the AAUW used book sale. It cost me a dollar. It’s (more than) good enough to make me feel as if I have stolen from them.

#

Hypothetical future album title: Self-Preservation for the Sake of Others

#

What is microblogging for?

#

Is style a virtue? If so, how?

#

Scott: Hey, no pointing. It makes me nervous.
Sullivan: I wasn’t pointing. I was air-rubbing your teeth.

#

Ever take a grief nap? I sure have.

#

Carla: There’s a book I wanna read.
Ɖa: Me, too. But I finished it.

#

Self-efficacy. To be virile and know it (without being haughty).

#

It’s a TikTok standoff. āœļø šŸŽ¤ šŸŽµ

#

Regarding my overpopulated social calendar, I have two directives for myself:

#

The CEB reads: ā€œYou have this faith and love because of the hope reserved for you in heavenā€ for Colossians. So the vision of heaven enables us to be faithful and loving! Fear of death be gone! You see this in stories of the original Christians.

#

ā€œMr. Casaubon, indeed, had not thoroughly represented those mixed reasons to himself; irritated feeling with him, as with all of us, seeking rather for justification than for self-knowledgeā€ (George Eliot, Middlemarch).

Isn’t this true for all irritations! We don’t seek the deep reason. We simply want to know we’re right in feeling!

#

Park Forest is a therapy dog. āœļø šŸŽ¤ šŸŽµ

#

When you marry, you relinquish unilateral control of your self-sacrifice. Most of it is automatically dedicated directly to domestic relationships. And even what remains is subject to a bilateral decision with your wife.

#

What could I be doing now in theory that I’m not doing because Carla thinks I would be overextending myself in light of family life and my involvement with house church (which is true):

Now, maybe once I finish the Cross essay, I can start singing again.

I should be more strategic with how I spend my time. Wait. More strategic? Oi vey.

#

Instead of my task list, my new default should be being with Carla.